<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eligibility For Relief in Chapter 13: Debt Limits &#8212; Proposed Legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wwrbankruptcy.com/2009/02/21/eligibility-for-relief-in-chapter-13-debt-limits-proposed-legislation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wwrbankruptcy.com/2009/02/21/eligibility-for-relief-in-chapter-13-debt-limits-proposed-legislation/</link>
	<description>WW&#38;R Bankruptcy practice group of Weltman, Weinberg &#38; Reis, the nation&#039;s largest creditor&#039;s rights law firm, is your source for bankruptcy news and information. We are committed to helping clients thrive in these ever changing times.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 01:39:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anika</title>
		<link>http://wwrbankruptcy.com/2009/02/21/eligibility-for-relief-in-chapter-13-debt-limits-proposed-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Anika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwrbankruptcy.com/?p=121#comment-181</guid>
		<description>Thank you.  I have been looking for proposed legislation to this end.  Has this been formally submitted?  An amendment to this effect would be extremely helpful for debtors seeking relief.  In fairness I think that an amendment should also include an exception for debtors whose debt limitations are exceeded because of a primary residence, regardless of whether it is undersecured.  In all likelihood, most real property of debtors currently seeking relief through bankruptcy will be undersecured.  I see the issue as preclusion of a bankruptcy option for debtors living in markets where the cost of a home far exceeds the average.  Do you know what the revised amounts will be in April?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you.  I have been looking for proposed legislation to this end.  Has this been formally submitted?  An amendment to this effect would be extremely helpful for debtors seeking relief.  In fairness I think that an amendment should also include an exception for debtors whose debt limitations are exceeded because of a primary residence, regardless of whether it is undersecured.  In all likelihood, most real property of debtors currently seeking relief through bankruptcy will be undersecured.  I see the issue as preclusion of a bankruptcy option for debtors living in markets where the cost of a home far exceeds the average.  Do you know what the revised amounts will be in April?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

