<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WWR Bankruptcy &#62; Your Bankruptcy News &#38; Information Source &#187; Nicole Kellner-Swick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wwrbankruptcy.com/author/nkellnersmith/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wwrbankruptcy.com</link>
	<description>WW&#38;R Bankruptcy practice group of Weltman, Weinberg &#38; Reis, the nation&#039;s largest creditor&#039;s rights law firm, is your source for bankruptcy news and information. We are committed to helping clients thrive in these ever changing times.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:43:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Judge Sanctions Debtor Attorneys for Bad Faith Claim Objections</title>
		<link>http://wwrbankruptcy.com/2011/11/21/judge-sanctions-debtor-attorneys-for-bad-faith-claim-objections/</link>
		<comments>http://wwrbankruptcy.com/2011/11/21/judge-sanctions-debtor-attorneys-for-bad-faith-claim-objections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicole Kellner-Swick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proof of Claim]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwrbankruptcy.com/?p=491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Damian A. Valladares, Esq. There has been a new and important development in bankruptcies in the Southern District of Florida on the subject of objections to creditors&#8217; Proofs of Claims. Responding to what he perceived to be a pervasive practice among debtors&#8217; attorneys, last week Judge John K. Olson of the Fort Lauderdale Division, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wwrbankruptcy.com/2011/11/21/judge-sanctions-debtor-attorneys-for-bad-faith-claim-objections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reaffirming Unsecured Debt in Western District of Pennsylvania</title>
		<link>http://wwrbankruptcy.com/2011/05/02/reaffirming-unsecured-debt-in-western-district-of-pennsylvania/</link>
		<comments>http://wwrbankruptcy.com/2011/05/02/reaffirming-unsecured-debt-in-western-district-of-pennsylvania/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 17:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicole Kellner-Swick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reaffirmation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unsecured debt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwrbankruptcy.com/?p=407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Keri P. Claeys, Esq. Recently, lenders/credit unions in Pennsylvania have been advised by debtors of their intentions and wishes to reaffirm unsecured lines of credit and/or visa loans in order to maintain their good relationship with the lending institution. With increasingly stringent lending practices and approval on loans being harder to secure, debtors are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wwrbankruptcy.com/2011/05/02/reaffirming-unsecured-debt-in-western-district-of-pennsylvania/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Avoiding Preference Risk</title>
		<link>http://wwrbankruptcy.com/2009/12/10/avoiding-preference-risk/</link>
		<comments>http://wwrbankruptcy.com/2009/12/10/avoiding-preference-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicole Kellner-Swick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Filings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avoid risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contemporaneous exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ordinary course]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preference payments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 547]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settlement agreement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwrbankruptcy.com/?p=276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Kevin C. Susman, Associate Creditors doing business with entities they suspect are on the verge of filing for bankruptcy protection need to be aware that they may be required to return the payments received from that entity within the 90 days preceding a bankruptcy filing. Whether you are a party to litigation entering into [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wwrbankruptcy.com/2009/12/10/avoiding-preference-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

