Tag Archive for 'foreclosure crisis'

Not Gone and Not Forgotten: Bankruptcy Reform and Cram Down

Published
by
Beth Schenz
on August 26, 2009
in Bankruptcy Act 2009 and Real Estate
. 0 Comments

Last month, House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (MA- D) indicated that he would revive the bankruptcy legislation that would allow debtors to cram down first mortgages.  Specifically, if the banks did not increase their efforts to modify existing home loans, Franks stated that he would revisit the bankruptcy cram down legislation. 

Not only is the House threatening bankruptcy cram down legislation but the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on the Administrative Oversight and Courts is also reviewing recommendations on modifying mortgages in bankruptcy.  

On August 20, 2009, the Senate Committee scheduled a hearing on “Mortgage Modifications during the Foreclosure Crisis: Is there a Role for Bankruptcy Courts?” At the August 20, 2009 hearing, testimony was taken from multiple homeowners on their negative experiences with loan modifications.  Also, Susan Bodington, Deputy Director for Programs, Rhode Island Housing testified that, “[b]ankruptcy reform could provide the incentive or pressure to expedite workouts and collaborate more effectively, but it should be structured in such a way that it does not penalize responsible lenders who made fair loans that were in the best interest of the customers when the loan was made, and who have worked with their customers compassionately to keep them in their homes.”  In his testimony, John Rao, attorney for National Consumer Law Center, strongly urged the need for bankruptcy reform.  Mr. Rao stated, “[a]doption of court-supervised mortgage loan modifications would sidestep many of the structural barriers in the servicing industry that today are preventing mass loan modifications from occurring.”

Before recess on July 23, 2009, the Senate Committee took testimony on “The Worsening Foreclosure Crisis: Is It Time to Reconsider Bankruptcy Reform?” (See previous blog entry).

While such government agencies like the Federal Housing Finance Agency have taken the unofficial position that forcing people into bankruptcy is the wrong solution and loan modification is the solution, loan modifications still remain low.  Currently, the treasury department is reporting that only 9% of eligible borrowers received modifications. 

The continuing rise in foreclosures, the high level of unemployment and the lack luster of loan modifications are creating pressure for Congress to revisit bankruptcy reform.  While once bankruptcy practitioners felt that the bankruptcy reform that would allow debtors to “cram down” their mortgage debt to the value of the real property was defeated in Congress, the case for bankruptcy reform still looms.

Still Looming: Bankruptcy Reform and Cramdown

Published
by
Beth Schenz
on July 24, 2009
in Bankruptcy Act 2009 and Real Estate
. 0 Comments

On July 23, 2009, the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Administrative Oversight and the Courts scheduled a hearing on “The Worsening Foreclosure Crisis: Is It Time to Reconsider Bankruptcy Reform?” Due to the rise in foreclosures and continuing high level of unemployment, Democratic senators are attempting to revisit the bankruptcy reform that would allow debtors to “cramdown” their mortgage debt to the value of the real property.

Those who presented testimony before the Committed were as follows:

Proponents for the Cramdown

Alys Cohen, staff attorney for the National Consumer Law Center, indicated that, “[u]nless HAMP both increases its reach and mandates principal reductions, Congress should pass legislation to allow bankruptcy judges to modify home loans in bankruptcy and also should consider further reforms to the servicing industry.”

Adam J. Levitin, Associate Professor of Law at Georgetown University Law Center opined that bankruptcy cramdowns are the only tool left to stabilize the foreclosure crisis. Mr. Levitin stated, “[b]ankruptcy courts are capable of immediately handling a large volume of filings, and the bankruptcy automatic stay would function like a foreclosure moratorium until cases could be sorted through.”

Proponent Against the Cramdown

Mark A. Calabria, Ph.D., Director of Financial Regulation Studies at the Cato Institute, stated that, “[i]t is not exploding ARMs or predatory lending that drives the current wave of foreclosures, but negative equity driven by house prices declines coupled with adverse income shocks that are the main driver of defaults on primary residences. Defaults on speculative properties continue to represent a large share of foreclosures. Accordingly for any plan to be successful it must address both negative equity and reductions in earnings. Cramdown fails on both accounts.”

General Comments

Richard Genirberg, J.D., M.B.A., M.A., who represents consumers and creditors in Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 bankruptcy cases offered that cramming down residential real estate loans would benefit his debtor clients. Also, Mr. Genirberg stated that, “[l]egislating cramdown of residential real estate would create a veritable ‘license to steal’ from mortgagees. Mr. Genirberg suggested Congress needed to decide what would be beneficial for the American economy.

The Ranking Member of the Committee, Senator Jeff Sessions (R-Alabama) opposes such cramdown provision. However, Senator Richard J. Durbin (D-Illinois) continues to press for mortgage cramdowns in bankruptcy. Congress is expected to break for recess in the second week in August, 2009.