Tag Archive for 'Real Estate'

Has Mortgage Cramdown Died Its Final Death?

The House on December 11, 2009 rejected an amendment to the Wall Street Reform and Protection Act of 2009 that would allow mortgage cramdowns in Chapter 13 bankruptcies.  The surprise is that this is the same amendment that the House passed earlier this year.  This time it was defeated by a vote of 241 to 188 with both Democrats and Republicans voting it down.

The proponents argued that it would have limited effect on the mortgage financing industry because it would only apply to existing loans, not future loans, while slowing the rate of foreclosures and home depreciation.

Opponents argued that it would create havoc and more losses to the already unstable mortgage and lending industries, while increasing interest rates and toughening mortgage standards for all home buyers. 

Because the measure has now been defeated by both the House and Senate, it is unlikely to reappear in another bill, and should ease one of the worries facing lenders and investors from the flurry of new financial regulatory legislation.

Additional Documentation Requirements in Southern Indiana and Southern Ohio

The Southern District of Indiana and the Southern District of Ohio are revising their Local Rules effective December 1, 2009. Both jurisdictions are revising their Rules to require creditors to attach a post-petition payment history to motions for relief from stay in Chapter 13 cases.

Additionally, the Southern District of Ohio will require additional documentation to be supplied with motions for relief from stay on real estate. Creditors will be required to attach a copy of the recorded deed upon which the debtor acquired the property to the motion for relief from stay.

Please include these additional documents when referring motions for relief form stay to our office in order for us to more quickly process the motion.

Procedure for Filing Notice of Mortgage Payment Change Amended in Western District of Pennsylvania

Effective January 1, 2010, the Western District of Pennsylvania Court Procedure will change regarding notifying the Court and the Debtor of monthly mortgage payment changes. The Chapter 13 Trustee is the acting disbursing agent for ongoing mortgage payments in this district.

Notice of Mortgage Payment Change must be filed with the Court at least twenty-one (21) days prior to the date that the change is to become effective or the Creditor is forever barred from collecting the difference in the change. In order to comply with this deadline, your attorney will need the information and documents as soon as possible after the escrow changes or the interest rate changes.

The Notice of Mortgage Payment Change must include:

  • A complete and accurate loan payment history;
  • A computation of the payment change “in a format which is readably understandable by the Court and the Parties-in-Interest;” and
  • A declaration under penalty of perjury by a competent official of the Creditor substantiating the veracity and accuracy of the requested change 

The Notice can no longer simply state what the monthly payment is and the effective date, rather, we will have to compute and accumulate detailed information justifying the change.

If a loan is transferred or sold, the procedure will now require the new owner to file a copy of any applicable lien assignment evidencing the Creditor’s alleged right to payment if the Creditor is not currently a Creditor “of record”. The assignment must also include, on a separate page, a narrative summary of the chain of title evidencing the Creditor’s authority to act and be paid.

After a Notice of Mortgage Payment Change is filed, the Court will issue a standard order requiring the debtor to:

  • Amend the chapter 13 plan;
  • File a declaration that the existing chapter 13 plan is sufficient to fund the plan with the modified debt; or
  • File an objection to the Notice of Mortgage Payment Change as stated and the Court will schedule a hearing on the matter

If a Declaration is filed by the debtor that the monthly plan payment doesn’t need to change, we recommend a review of the Chapter 13 Trustee’s website to be sure that the changed monthly payment amount is disbursed. If an Objection to the Notice of Mortgage Payment Change is filed, additional documentation may be necessary to defend the Notice of Mortgage Payment Change.

If lenders want to be paid post petition fees, expenses or charges, then within 180 days from the date incurred, lenders must file a Notice of Post-Petition Fees, Expenses and Charges. Examples of fees incurred post petition are attorney fees, BPO fees, property inspections and other administrative fees. The notice must include an itemized list of the fees and expenses and when they were incurred. The Court will issue a standard Order giving the Debtor twenty-one (21) days to amend the plan, file a declaration, or object to the Notice.

Lenders must now be very diligent in administering loans secured by real estate and file the required notices with the court on a timely basis, or they will be barred from collecting increases in payments and other expenses. WWR is continuing to monitor these developments and will advise you as procedures change so that you can take the steps necessary to protect yourself while the debtor is in bankruptcy. 

The Administrative Order implementing this new procedure can be found on the Western District of Pennsylvania Bankruptcy Court’s website at http://www.pawb.uscourts.gov.

If you have any questions regarding this client advisory, please contact Ms. Holly C. Thurman, Esq. Holly is an associate in the bankruptcy department within the Real Estate Default Group of Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., L.P.A., and is located in the Pittsburgh office. She can be reached directly at 412.338.7105 or via e-mail at hthurman@weltman.com.

Possible Compromise This Week on Bankruptcy Cramdown Legislation

While the House passed a bill permitting mortgage cramdowns, the Senate has yet to do so.  However, it hopes to have a compromise in place this week.  Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill) met with banks, credit unions, and consumer groups to negotiate terms for the Senate bill.

Details are sketchy, but it appears that the terms would further limit the pool of borrowers who may be permitted to reduce the principal balance on mortgages in bankruptcy.  If a lender offers a refinance that reduces the interest rate through the current Obama plan, a borrower may not be permitted to reduce the principal balance in a Chapter 13 plan.  This is obviously an incentive for lenders to offer refinancing to certain borrowers in an attempt to avoid a reduction of the principal balance by a bankruptcy judge.

“At-risk low income borrowers” and those who spend less than 31% of their income on home mortgage payments would be ineligible as well for principal write-downs.  The program would apply only to loans originated before 2009, and would end in 2014, thus limiting bankruptcy cram downs to approximately five years from enactment of any bill.

WWR will continue to keep you informed as this Senate bill takes form.

Foreclosure Rates Rise To Their Highest Levels In First Quarter of 2009

On Thursday April 16, 2009 RealtyTrac reported that foreclosure rates in March 2009 increased by 17% from February.  The increase came as many mortgage lenders ended temporary moratoriums imposed on the filing of foreclosures.  The March and first quarter totals also jumped 24% from a year ago and were the highest since RealtyTrac began reporting foreclosure rates.  In the first 3 months of the year, 1 out of every 159 U.S. Households received a foreclosure filing, which includes a notice of default, auction sale or bank repossession.  Filings were reported on over 803,000 properties in the first quarter of 2009.  The states with the highest percentage of foreclosure filing were: California, Florida, Nevada, Arizona, and Illinois.  Those 5 states accounted for nearly 60% of the U.S. foreclosure activity.  Ohio still ranks in the top 10 for the states with the most foreclosure filings.

It seems that Congressional programs aimed at limiting the number of foreclosures have had little affect on lowering the rate of foreclosures.  However, it may yet be too early to see results from these recently passed Congressional programs.  In this market, lenders should continue to work with borrowers to modify loans for homeowners who are able to continue making payments.  Working directly with borrowers is the most cost effective and efficient way to limit the damage of the worst housing market since the Great Depression.